Platform
Intelligent, and deliberately not autonomous
Varetiq reads your ledger for patterns worth a second look — unusual spend, drifting margin, a customer paying later than they used to — and hands you the question. The judgment stays yours.
- Explains every flag
- Never posts on its own
- Dismissals are remembered
Action Center/ Needs reviewEach item states its reasoning. Dismissing one records why, so it does not return unchanged.
- Reason shown
- Always
- Silent posting
- Never
- Priority levels
- 3
- From your decisions
- Learned
No unexplained scores or ratings.
A person approves every ledger change.
Sized by money and urgency, not volume.
Dismissals shape what surfaces next.
What it looks for
The questions a good bookkeeper would raise
Duplicate-looking spend, categories drifting from their pattern, a customer stretching payment, revenue recorded without support, balances that have not moved when they should have.
In practice
- Spend and revenue anomalies against your own history
- Receivable behaviour changes per customer
- Accounts that stopped moving
- Support and documentation gaps before the close
How it behaves
A colleague, not an autopilot
Varetiq is explicit about the limits of what it can know. It surfaces, explains, and proposes — and then waits. Nothing in your books changes because software felt confident.
In practice
- Every suggestion is reversible before it is applied
- Confidence is described in words, not a mystery percentage
- Guidance is informational and not tax, legal, or investment advice
- You can turn categories of insight off entirely
Open the Action Center
See how flagged items are ranked, explained, and resolved.